Question Could assessment of purchase behaviour h Essays - Bacteria

Question: Could assessment of purchase behaviour help to identify the contaminated food commodity? Introduction to the case Most cases occurred in elderly males. June 2009 to January 2010 Signicance of the case The main route of transmission is known to be through consumption of contaminated food. However, infection can also (in very rare cases) be transmitted directly from infected animals to humans. The bacterium is particularly successful in causing foodborne disease, because it survives food processing technologies that rely on acidic or salty conditions, and, unlike many other pathogens, can continue to multiply slowly at low temperatures, allowing growth even in properly refrigerated foods Regulatory aspects -EU Directive 2073/2005. -Regulation states that L. monocytogenes must be absent from food, but can be present up to a limit of 100 CFU/g if the physicochemical prole of a food commodity prevents growth (the bacteria must not exceed 100 CFU/g food at the end of shelf-life; Anonymous, 2006). Since listeriosis is usually caused by a higher number of L. monocytogenes (10 5 CFU/g), the search began for a food item that fosters growth and that is predominantly eaten by elderly persons. smoked sh products, soft cheeses and cooked sausages What made outbreak investigations difcult? incubation period of listeriosis in humans can be up to 70 days, the outbreak pattern is quite scattered foodstuffs have usually been eaten or already thrown away before an outbreak investigation starts. -Collected grocery receipts of purchases made by seven patients in December 2009, and screened them for a common food item. -The survey of the purchase behaviour allowed us to generate a hypothesis that was then tested by a case-control study using case-case comparisons. - Patients were asked about consumption of 12 cheese products in the six-month period prior to disease onset. - Persons in the control group were requested to provide information on consumption of the same products and a parameter called the odds ratio' was computed Resolution and outcomes Clinical dynamics -Median age of the cases was 72 years (range: 57-89 years), and 26 patients were male. There were no materno-neonatal(-) cases. Prevalence of underlying disease in the case group was not different from the prevalence of underlying disease in the control group. Contamination rates of samples and recalled lots of Quargel Three out of 16 L. monocytogenes positive lots showed a contamination rate of 100 CFU/g at the beginning of the shelf-life when stored at 4 C. Nevertheless, by increasing the storage time or the storage temperature (15 C, 22 C) the contamination rate could be raised to 10. In general, storage at 4 C resulted in an average of 5.6 log units, a signicantly minor contamination rate compared with storage at 15 C or 22 C with mean log values of 7.2 and 6.8, respectively. Lower storage temperatures are supposed to slow down bacterial growth and may restrict amounts to non-harmful doses. This was not the case in this outbreak. Although there was an overall higher variation in the samples stored at 4 C than in samples kept at 15 C or 22 C, and even though the mean values differed signicantly, maximum levels were similar. This nding indicates a high potential for growth even when Quargel is stored at 4 C At-site contamination scenarios An environmental L. monocytogenes 1/2a isolate from the suspect production plant, from a gully (drainage pit) sample collected in December 2009, became available on 19 January 2010 and proved indistinguishable from the outbreak strain by genotyping. Commentary and personal reections -majority of outbreak investigations do not found the source. - The outbreak dynamics show clearly that a decline in case numbers does not necessarily imply that the underlying problem has disappeared. - a L. monocytogenes isolate from an environmental sample taken by the quality manager in the facility in May 2009 was the rst evidence of a contamination problem. - We hypothesize that L. monocytogenes was introduced into the plant during major construction work. -From 23 February 2009 until 27 May 2009, a ripening room in direct proximity to the central production facility was remodeled, and this coincides with the time of the rst documented detection of L. monocytogenes in a smear sample, allegedly after years of no microbiological proof of L. monocytogenes in the facility. - This nding emphasizes the unequivocal need for implementing a self-control system capable of detecting contamination -This strong recommendation becomes

American Beauty Sequence Analysis Essays

The Graduate/American Beauty Sequence Analysis Essays The Graduate/American Beauty Sequence Analysis Essay The Graduate/American Beauty Sequence Analysis Essay Essay Topic: American Beauty Sequence Analysis: The Graduate The Graduate is a subversive, wistful coming-of-age tale epitomizing the ambiguity of reaching adulthood, and the struggle of this experience. Robert Surtees, the cinematographer, successfully uses mise-en-scene to illustrate these particular themes. A variety of props are scattered throughout the opening sequence that allude to Ben’s melancholy and detachment. Additionally, the same sequence uses social and graphic blocking to depict the impedance Ben feels from his parents and their friends. The sequence begins with a scene of Benjamin sitting in front of his fish tank, submerged in thoughts of his future, and later confronted by his father. Fill lighting isolates Ben’s face from the dim background, and enhances the overall sense of glum and dispassion. Moreover, Ben’s impassive expression and wish for a ‘different’ future is also in strong contrast to the enthusiasm and conformity seen later at the party. The subtle placement of the sea-diver beside Ben only adds to this sense of alienation, while, at the same time, foreshadows the comical events at the second cocktail party later in the movie. In fact, the use of water is frequent throughout the film as tool to illustrate Ben’s self-reflection and wavering identity. Perhaps the prop most indicative of Ben, or at least humorous, is the black and white portrait of a clown frowning behind a painted smile, which is briefly shown before Ben’s parents lead him into the party. Clearly, the painting acts as a metaphor for Ben’s character within the sequence, yet, it is so outlandish that the mise-en-scene momentarily teeters from naturalistic to theatrical. However, this is characteristic of The Graduate as a whole. While the movie seems to maintain a certain level of absurdity throughout, it is always hidden behind a certain amount of reality, which is what makes the film’s message so poignant. The quintessential example of this is when Mr. McGuire informs Ben about â€Å"Plastics† at the end of the sequence. From a modern viewpoint, this advice seems to be downright elementary, but considering the film was released prior to the industrialization of plastic, a viewer at that time would find no more use of the information than Ben appeared to. Thus, the shallow dialogue exemplifies Ben’s lack of direction, while appealing to the despondent generation at the time. Surtees continues to build these themes and messages with the use of social and graphic blocking. At the beginning of the sequence, Ben’s father and mother are positioned in a way that blocks him within the shot, obviously representing their overbearing nature. His mother, in particular, consumes the entire frame when she enters the room. You can also see how tight their hold is on Ben by the claustrophobic camera shots at the graduation party later on. The following series of scenes within the sequence show Ben being grabbed and bounced back and forth between forced conversations. Altogether, these social and graphic blockings attempt to illustrate Ben being forced in a disappointing direction through a superficial society filled with high expectations. The sequence also serves as a strong parallel to the movie’s ending where Ben figuratively and literally overcomes these obstacles by pushing Elaine and himself through a furious horde of adults at the wedding. In this respect, the two sequences function as bookends, giving resolution to the controversies constructed within the movie. Sequence Analysis: American Beauty American Beauty successfully builds off of the themes in The Graduate, while also developing modern messages that appeal to a contemporary audience. The film follows Lester Burnham, a depressed suburban father in the middle of a mid-life crisis, as he attempts to free himself from his mundane and mediocre lifestyle. The mise-en-scene in the early sequence of Lester at his office effectively conveys this initial feeling of mediocrity and repression. One of the subtlest yet illustrative dimensions of the sequence’s mise-en-scene is lighting. For instance, the natural lighting in Lester’s cubicle is soft and consistent, signifying the monotony of his work duties. When the shot pans out to depict the entire office space, the grid-like pattern of desk lamps suggest a repetitive nature to his workplace, and the similar arrangement of overhead lights possibly indicates a similar pattern in upper management. The cinematographer, Conrad Hall, also uses harsh directional lighting later on when Lester enters Brad’s office. There is a small ray of outside light radiating from the closed blinds next to Brad’s desk that illuminates Lester throughout the conversation. This streak of light is used to highlight Lester’s face during key instances such as when Brad tells him that this is his one chance to save his job, thus creating a stronger emotional moment. In conjunction with lighting, the color within the sequence tends to add to the vapidity of Lester’s workplace. In strong contrast to the predominant and bold red frequent throughout the movie, Lester’s cubicle is consumed in bland neutral colors that are mirrored in other parts of the sequence. Altogether, Hall effectively uses soft lighting compounded with weak colors to create a feeling of mediocrity that fuels Lester’s future escapades. Comical props and costumes within the sequence lighten the glum ambiance in the sequence while also foreshadowing later events. Exemplary, Brad wears a classic business style suit with a dull blue shirt underneath, mirroring the bleak and repetitive colors in the office. Laughably however, he is also wearing a flamboyant tie that alludes to the person he truly is; a manager attempting to befriend his subordinates and reduce feelings of intimidation. In addition to this, Lester waives a pencil with an overly large soccer ball eraser when conversing with Brad. The funny pencil top hints at the immature state that Lester resorts back to while attempting to overcome his mediocre lifestyle. One could also argue that Lester’s sarcastic demeanor is also reminiscent of an adolescent and is epitomized when he states, â€Å"For you Brad, I’ve got five! † These blatant facades are exemplarily of American Beauty as a whole. Typically, the more troubled a character is, the more they attempt to cover their reality with an illusion. This is clearly an attempt to point out flaws in a modern superficial society. However, the funny props add a humorous touch to the film that makes its social messages less harsh. Hall uses camera angles within the sequence to display the hierarchy of authority in the workplace, which is also representative of the repression Lester tries to free himself of. For example, the camera is always looking up toward Brad while the opposite is true for Lester, obviously portraying Brad in a higher position of power than Lester. The high angel shot of Lester in his cubicle not only depicts him in a minor and passive manner but also places his coworkers within the shot. This gives the perception that Lester’s position and purpose within the workspace is relatively small and negligible. In contrast, Brad is isolated from his peers in the shot, enhancing his overall sense of superiority and reaffirms he is indeed above everyone. The following scene in Brad’s office enhances this effect with the use of perspective. The same camera angles are used for Brad and Lester; however, Brad is much larger in his shots while Lester appears significantly farther and hence smaller in the screen. Consequently, the hierarchical relationship is once again displayed.

Family Friendly Policy and Optimum Shifts for Nurses Essay

Family Friendly Policy and Optimum Shifts for Nurses - Essay Example It has been suggested that the UK economy is dependant on workers who work long hours, and if the EU chooses to remove the "opt-out" clause the UK will bode poorly (Cooper, 2003; Parker, 2006). At present, the UK Government wishes to be informed of the multitude of views of stakeholders affected by the consequences of long working shifts. Input is expected to be used to collaboratively construct better legislation and policies that focus on the health and well being of shift workers. Inclusive deliberation over policy aligns UK best practices with those of the European Union (EU), which is currently renewing the 1993 Working Time Directive (93/104/EC) (Department of Trade and Industry [DTI], 2004). This paper aims to review shift working patterns and family friendly policies for nurses in the UK. Firstly, family friendly policies with regard to labour in the UK will be presented. Secondly, shift pattern differences between 8 and 12 hours shall be discussed with regard to family life. Thirdly, the effects of shift patterns on older nurses and their perceptions of shift work affects on family life will be delineated. Next, recommendations for best practices within the UK shall be provided. Finally, a conclusion shall synthesise the main points of the paper. It has been stated by the UK Government that it will implement changes to the European Working Time Directive (what is known as the Horizon... It is reported that a large number of workers in the UK work in excess of a 48 hours (Royal College of Physicians, 2006).Family friendly policies focus on the psycho-social aspects of work, and highlight the importance of values and interaction between children and caregivers, not only to these parties, but also to the wider community, and subsequently social environments that overlap with work (Nickson, Warhurst, Lockyer & Dutton, 2004). Children gain from family friendly policies by way of; socialisation; well being; education; reduced risk of anti-social behaviour; and alternative models for the female role (i.e., as equal participants). Caregivers have the opportunity for increased identity integration and satisfaction with life in general by participating in family-oriented activities. An organisation such as a hospital or other health care delivery environment will benefit from enhanced work performance, better communication and interpersonal skills of staff, and increased high quality care for patients, resulting in both patient and employee (Equal Opportunities Commission [EOC], 2006). From a social point of view, enhanced family functioning, intergenerational and inter gender relationships, combined with a positive view toward childbearing, can boost and maintain a sustainable economy.A good example of inclusive family policies is reflected in the recognition of fatherhood as a valuable psycho-social experience. Since the 1960s radical changes within family structure have taken place (e.g., nuclear families may now be extended to include relatives, step-, bi-racial; adopted; same-sex or single-parent). As such, prioritise have changed, and the contemporary dad wants to spend

GOODYEAR WILL IT SURVIVE THIS ECONOMY Research Paper

GOODYEAR WILL IT SURVIVE THIS ECONOMY - Research Paper Example Ratio Industry Comparison 1.5x Quick Ratio Industry Comparison 0.9x LONG-TERM SOLVENCY - GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (GT) Total Debt/Equity Industry Comparison 315.3x Total Liabilities/Total Assets Industry Comparison 90.4x GROWTH OVER PRIOR YEAR - GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (GT) Total Revenue Industry Comparison 15.53% Tangible Book Value Industry Comparison 48.15% EBITDA Industry Comparison 56.89% Gross Profit Industry Comparison 27.36% Receivables Industry Comparison 8.03% Inventory Industry Comparison 21.86% Diluted EPS Before Extra Industry Comparison -42.58% Capital Expenditures Industry Comparison 26.54% Cash From Ops. ... ble Book Ratio -18.03 Most recent data  Ã‚  Ã‚   5-Year Averages Return on Assets -0.5% Return on Invested Capital -1.4% Gross Profit Margin 20.8% Pre-Tax Profit Margin 0.1% Post-Tax Profit Margin -0.9% Net Profit Margin (Total Operations) -0.4% R&D as a % of Sales 0.0% SG&A as a % of Sales 13.8% Debt/Equity Ratio 5.24 Total Debt/Equity Ratio 5.83 Price Earnings Ratios P/E Ratio 26 Weeks Ago 17.9 12 Month Normalized P/E Ratio 150.1 GT Ratios & Returns Price-to-sales 0.2 Return on Equity 0.0 Operating Margin 7.6 Profit Margin -1.1% More GT Ratios & Returns > GT Financials Sales $18.832 bil Profits $-0.216 bil Assets $15.63 bil Employees 72000.0 ANALYSIS Goodyear is a prestigious company that has dominated the market by producing tire, rubber, and glass products. Recently, the company has recorded profits of $16,302 million at the fiscal year of 2009. This was a disappointing figure considering the fact that the company has a revenue increase of 16% in 2009. The net loss for the comp any was $375 million, compared to last year which was only around $77 million. Hence, the company’s revenue stream was declined 16% from last year. The company’s financial ratios no doubt indicate that the company is facing tough times. For instance, the net loss in their operations is a drastic $375 million. This type of deficit will not enable the company to thrive in these harsh economic times. Furthermore, the company’s earnings per share is extremely low, which raises the questions for the stockholders. The return on investment capital is -1.4%, which means that the company has low funds to buy fixed assets. The price/tangible book ratio is -18.03, which means the stock is undervalued. The company must need to address this issue immediately in order for the company to be marginal. In

The Impact of Information Technogoly in Public agency Research Paper

The Impact of Information Technogoly in Public agency - Research Paper Example The  Federal Bureau of Investigation  (FBI) is a  US government agency attached to the Department of Justice with its headquarters in Edgar Hoover Building, Washington D.C (FBI, 2012). The US government established the FBI in 1908 with a core mission of investigating federal crime, enforcing federal laws, enhancing national security, and bringing criminals to justice (Hamilton, 2007). Its priorities include protecting the United States from terrorist attacks, protecting civil rights, combating public corruption and all forms of crime, protecting the United States against cyber-based attacks, supporting local and international partners, combat transnational criminal organizations, and protecting the United States against foreign intelligence (United States Department of Justice, 2010). To realize its priorities and mission, the FBI relies on domestic and foreign Intelligence, Law Enforcement Communities, federal government support, and top class information technology to improve its operations operational and enhance the effectiveness of the agency. However, with the recent and vibrant technological advancements terrorist and criminals are now using recent technologies to launch attacks to its allies and US. Hence, to remain reliable in its commission, the FBI requires the best of information technology to keep in pace and curb the high-tech insecurity. As such, the FBI has developed the FBIs IT strategic plan and initiated measures of acquiring the best information technology professionals, digitized its operations, and maintained the FBIs IT enterprise and website (United States Department of Justice, 2010). This has been significant in providing technical direction FBI business processes, maintaining the FBIs technology assets, and providing high-tech identification and information services relating to national

Hobbes State of Nature

Hobbes State of Nature Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) who is considered by some to be the greatest English political philosopher defended the need for an absolute sovereign, a ruler who would have unlimited powers of rule and punishment, he based his belief by imagining what life in the state of nature would be like and he supposed that life in this state would be solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short .Hobbes based this idea on his theory of human nature, he believed that all human beings seek to satisfy their desires moreover since there is no sum mum bonum or highest good for men but rather a constant succession of appetites, what each human being most wants is not any particular thing but the generalized capacity to satisfy new desires as they emerge: to assure forever, the way of his future desire (Leviathan:47). Conflict can arise from any attempt by humans to satisfy their desires for they may go to any lengths to do so and in the state of nature there are no moral limits to mens action: The notions of Right and Wrong, Justice and Injustice have there no place and they may kill another for anything they deem necessary to their life. Dawkins (1989) tends to agree with Hobbes, he also sees human nature as selfish, and he claims that selfishness is contained in every gene even though everyone has distinctive genes. Dawkins goes on to say that competitive behavior is programmed biologically. Nevertheless Dawkins differs from Hobbes because he stresses that it makes more sense if people join forces for mutual benefit. However just because a gene contains a selfishness streak does not mean that the individual will be selfish. Hobbes (Cited in Hampsher-Monk (1992) claims that the only naturally occurring authority that exists is that of a mother over her child and this link only prospers because the child is much weaker than the mother and its survival depends on the mother. This type of connection does not exist between adult human beings, although Hobbes does accept that some human beings possess more strength than others, although every human being has the ablity to kill another. Even the strongest must sleep ; even the weakest might persuade others to help him to kill another (Leviathan, xiii.1-2) furthermore because adults are equal in this capacity to threaten each others lives, Hobbes claims that there is no natural source of authority to order their lives together. Hobbes main argument for an absolute sovereign was that any type of government is better than the State of Nature, a condition where people are forced into contact with each other in the absence of a superior authority. A condition of war of every man against every man (Leviathan, ch. 13). Hobbes gave three explanations why life in a state of nature would mean a state of war, where people would always be in a continual readiness to fight. Firstly there would be no production and this in turn would mean there would be limited resources; people would have to take by force the possessions they require from others. Secondly people would attack first as a way of defending themselves. Lastly people would just attack others just to gain a reputation for being strong so as to put off others. The result of all this would be hostility between people and there would be no trust. Underlying the state of nature is the struggle for survival and fear of death and to counter these conditions people must use the dictates of reason and voluntarily join together forming a collective union supported by a social contract. Hobbes places great weight on contracts and he often speaks of covenants, by which he means a contract where one person performs his part of the agreement later than the other. In a state of nature such arrangements would not work because only the weakest will have good reason to fulfill the second part of a covenant and then only if the stronger person is watching over them. One opposition to this is that are people not able to behave in a fair and honest way? Even where there is no government giving laws. This objection assumes that people possess a basic sense of morality and believes that all this would overcome the greed, attacks and defensive fighting that Hobbes talks about. Hobbes makes two declarations the first is to do with our duties in the state of nature that is the right of nature, the second involves the risks posed by peoples differing beliefs of what is right and wrong. Hobbes definition of the right of nature is the entitlement to save our own lives by any means possible, he goes on to say that the most terrible thing that can befall us is a brutal death caused by others. Hobbes continues by saying that we have a right to decide what will save our lives. He goes further by saying that in a state of nature we have a right to everything even to one anothers body (Leviathan, xiv.4). His argument seems to be a bit extreme at this point, but if a person decides that they require something for example the death of another person or their labor to make sure that they can survive, in a state of nature there exists no influence to judge these actions as right or wrong. However Hobbes believes that human beings are able to adhere to some principles whi ch are not found in religion but can in some ways be paired with religion. In (Leviathan,xiv.4) the first law commands that every man ought to endeavour peace, as far as he has hope of obtaining it and when he cannot obtain it he may seek and use all helps and advantages of war. The second law says that a man be willing, when others are so too as far-forth as for peace and defense of him he shall think it necessary to lay down this right to all things and be contented with so much liberty against other men, as he would allow other men against himself. (Leviathan, xiv.5) Hobbes thinks that people should act as if they have made a contract with others in a society, however this does not include the sovereign authority. With Hobbes social contract all people give up their right to all things (Leviathan, xiv.5) although the sovereign does not give up this right. In this agreement, people agree to only retain the right to protect their lives in cases of direct peril, but the decision of what poses an immediate threat depends on judgment, nevertheless it does allow us to retaliate if the sovereign attempts to take our lives. There are practical reasons for the sovereign not participating in contracts with their subjects, firstly it is not practical for the sovereign to make a covenant with everyone individually and it is not possible to make a covenant with the population as a whole because while the sovereign is being created, people are still in a state of nature and do not trust each other. One of the roles of the sovereign is to punish those who have acted unjustly but it is also the sovereigns right because people have forfeited their rights to the sovereign who is not held responsible for the possible injury or death of subjects. The most important role of the sovereign according to Hobbes is to prescribe the rules, whereby every man may know what goods he may enjoy, and what actions he may do, without being molested by any of his fellow-subjects. This role protects against the inevitable competition that will arise between people over scarce resources. However Hobbes theory gives way for criticism if the sovereign is unjust, but Hobbes counters this by stating that the sovereign cannot be unjust and ultimately Hobbes believed that government was more preferable than social chaos, especially under an absolute sovereign. Another key aspect of sovereignty is the right of making war and peace with other nations and commonwealths which reflects the obligation of the sovereign to protect their subjects. The sovereign however retain s their right of nature although Hobbes does concede that there are moral limits on what sovereigns should do. Hobbes arguments have been contested by many among which is John Locke ([1690] 1965) who was concerned that an absolute sovereign with absolute power would be even more of a hazard to us than life in a state of nature. After all, how could we have faith in the sovereign to act in the citizens interests rather than his or her own? So Locke argued that even though we could do with a sovereign to straighten out disputes and dispense justice, we must also lay down constitutional limits to the sovereigns rule and in addition we also have a right to fight back if the sovereign abuses our faith. Hobbes argument has weakness in that it has the tendency of legitimate monarchs to quietly slide over into being despots; (Fukuyama,1989:157-158) with no institutional devices like elections for finding out popular consent, it would be difficult to know whether a particular monarch had the kind of sanction Hobbes himself had in mind(Fukuyama, 1989:157-158). Fukuyama then makes it clear that it was relatively easy for John Locke to change Hobbes principal of monarchical sovereignty into one of parliamentary or legislative sovereignty based on majority rule. Lockes alternate to the Hobessian dilemma is not absolute monarchy but restricted government which consists of a constitutional government providing protection for the citizens basic rights and whose authority is resulted from the consent of the people(Fukuyama, 1989). It is clear that Locke views Hobbes right to preservation of ones life as meaning a right to revolution against a tyrant who used his power unjustly against the inte rests of the people (Fukuyama, 1989:158). Lockes offers a perfect solution to the classic question: Who would guard the guardians? Hobbes deduces that an absolute sovereign is a highest power, an earthly God, who has been called upon to protect people from each other. The absolute sovereign is given various powers through which they can institute and keep peace to prevent reverting back into the state of nature. Hobbes main argument for the need for an absolute sovereign is that a state of war would be horrific for everyone but that very same reason will mean that we carry on living in such a state. The only probable way to escape a state of war is through the formation of an influence that can intimidate the people and force them to live in peace with each other. On the other hand, Hobbes fails to prove that we have an almost unlimited obligation to do what the sovereign tells us to do, furthermore his arguments that sovereignty which includes the power to moderate moral and political matter and put in force those judgments cannot be separated, are not only weak but they are clearly opposed by the somewhat succ essful division of powers in modern liberal societies. The shocking crimes of twentieth century perpetrated by dictatorships make obvious to us beyond doubt that verdicts about what is right or wrong cannot be a problem only for our political leaders, it also has to be a question for us as individuals. So although Hobbes does justify the need for an absolute sovereign with his arguments, they have been refuted by some thinkers like Locke ([1690] 1965) and Rousseau ([1762] 1913) who have proposed having a sovereign whose power is limited so as to prevent tyranny.

The Cold War Essay -- American History Cold War Violence Essays

From the years 1947 through 1965 the United States was feeling a big impact from the Cold War on their ways of life. The biggest impact of this was seen among the middle class who were quickly rising to be the social class majority. From 1946 until 1964 births were reaching record highs with 76 million babies. This was an increase from just 44 million from 1929 through 1945. With a post-war perspective, Americans ?were better off than ever before?. This could partly be due to the economic boom that had swept the country after World War II was over. This boom was led by the automobile, construction, and defense industries; this boom lasted for twenty-five years. All of these changes in American culture were due to breakout of the Cold War (Norton 788). The United States, in the year 1947, Harry Truman had been president for two years. Unfortunately, as Vice President, Truman had been kept in the dark from Franklin Delano Roosevelt (the current President) about military and foreign objectives. Having to deal with the onset of the Cold War, Truman was also confused and felt inadequate. He managed to anger almost everyone including liberals and conservatives, farmers, consumers, and union members (Norton 788). It definitely did not help that from 1949 to 1950 bad things kept happening to the United States. In June of 1949 the Soviet Union set off a nuclear weapon test bomb in Siberia. It was announced to the country as a whole in September of the same year. This managed to leave the United States very vulnerable; however, it would be hard for the Soviets to deliver a nuclear weapon and to detonate it within the boundaries of the country. In 1949 the Civil War in China between the Nationalists and the Co... ...in the suburbs. The people who fled to the newly formed suburbs were often in a group of their own; many were white middle-class families. This led to definite lines being drawn between races. The minorities consisting of African Americans, Hispanics, and others stayed in the cities. The change was so pronounced that many have called the movement of white from the cities to the suburbs ?white flight? (Manzione). This caused a very restrictive and rigid culture among the races. Americans as a whole went through many different thought processes during the Cold War era. They went from thinking they were virtually invincible to realizing that their world could crumble in a matter of minutes with weapons of mass destruction. The Soviet Union challenged America during this time period and this created many cultural changes and complexities.

Big One

They came to America looking for religious opportunity and consequently were dedicated religious families. Their general public was religious based family arranged, depending on angling and cultivating on little scale, seeing themselves as to be â€Å"much more genuine than all different pilgrims†. These actualities clarify why New England had the witchcraft panics and no uprisings like the Bacon's Rebellion. Then again, the Chesapeake homesteaders came to America looking for gold, silver, or else other possibilities that could come about into benefit.They raised tobacco and corn for fare to Europe and their yields flourished. Economy influenced the general populace, made in larger part of dark slaves working the manors, ND subsequently religion was less extreme in the Chesapeake provinces. The fundamental church was the Anglican Church and numerous individuals did not partake at all in the religious exercises. These truths clarify why Chesapeake had the Bacon's Rebellion and no witchcraft alarms. Religion wasn't as critical in the Chesapeake provinces as it was further North.This is on account of the larger part of those going to the states in Virginia, for instance, were there for profiting and were accordingly primarily embodied vendors, as opposed to Puritans, for instance. Simply needed to include that elision wasn't the ONLY reason for the witchcraft alarms, yet this is the least demanding to bring up. With respect to Bacon's Rebellion, this was a rebellion made up basically by obligated servants, who felt they were being â€Å"held down† by those they worked for. Bound servants were basic in the Chesapeake range. In New England, there weren't the same number of.There was basically a spotlight on families cooperating to accomplish work, instead of having obligated servants doing the work. So since there weren't almost the same number of obligated servants in New England, there wasn't anything like Bacon's Rebellion. . What made Native Americ an peoples vulnerable to conquest by European adventurers? Mans Native Americans history is both captivating and from multiple points of view, heartbreaking. Assessments range from around 10 – 90 million Native Americans occupied America at the time Of the European entries.They had existed in the area numerous, numerous years before white man set foot on their dirt. It is accepted that amid the ice age, they had voyage an area connect over the Bring Sound, from Siberia into what is currently Alaska. They had step by step relocated over the area and southward into Mexico ND past. The name â€Å"Indian† was provided for them by Christopher Columbus who mistakenly accepted he had arrived in the Indies. They have been marked Indians, American Indians, and the now favored Native Americans.They relocated to all locales of the area and were structured into various tribes or countries. These were an individuals who adjusted well to their specific locales and made insightful ut ilization of all characteristic assets accessible. They put stock in regarding the area and the plenitude of blessings it advertised. They got to be capable anglers, seekers, cultivated harvests, for example, corn, and assembled homes with whatever accessible assets their domain gave. Some of these included creature skins, sun-dried block for adobes, or wood for long houses relying upon the districts.The Native American people groups substantiated themselves substandard compared to the European champions from social, efficient, political and military perspectives. A large number of them were in decrease before the entry of the Europeans; they overburdened nature by chasing, exhausting the fauna and greenery. They additionally passed on from urban maladies, in the same ay as tuberculosis and on top of this, they didn't have resistance to the new European ailments and many thousands were slaughtered along these lines. The survivors intermarried and settled in less compelling groups.Th e Indian populace developed gradually in view of the unforgiving conditions. On an alternate hand, the Europeans had unrivaled military engineering; they were wearing metal protective layers, overwhelming weapons and they had cavalry. The Aztec had the information of sanitized gold however did not know how to make iron apparatuses and weapons. 3. What was the role of the colonies in the British mercantilism system? Mans In the mercantilism framework colonies were relied upon to help the homeland attain to a great offset of exchange, ideal specie inflow, financial independence and a fare overflow.States were required to supply items which would overall must be gotten from non-royal sources, produce trades by the creation and offer of items sought after outside the domain, and give a business to the motherland's fares. The homeland would furnish the states with incorporated administrative control of the economy, and additionally maritime and military security. Under the mercantilism f ramework, the part of settlement was to help its â€Å"motherland. † The homeland needed to fare things that were more significant than whatever it needed to import. The American states' part in the British mercantilism framework was to help get this going.They should give items that could be sent out via England and they should purchase profitable things from England. This implied several things. First and foremost, it implied that the provinces would not be permitted to fare things straightforwardly to different nations. Rather, they needed to send them to England first so England could profit when the merchandise were traded. Second, it implied that the provinces were not permitted to make things that would contend with things made in England. Britain needed the pioneers to import things, not to make their own.According to the English laws that systematized these advancements for North America were instituted over a century and were assembled around a progression of Naviga tion Acts starting in 1 651. They were given a complete structure in 1696. English mediation in the economy keeping in mind the end goal to serve national investments delivered budgetary and key focal points to the states. By giving the states the greater part of the delivery rights on exchange tit England, British mercantilism profited the settlements. Mercantilism inexorably brought exchange question with different nations, which thusly frequently declined into military battles.All things considered, then, the provinces' part was to give things that the British could fare and purchase things from Britain. In both ways, they would help England have the capacity to fare more than it transported in. 4. How did the Great War for Empire change the relationship between England and its American colonies? Mans In spite of the fact that a large portion of the North American battling finished n September 8, 1760, when the Marquis De Vaudeville surrendered Montreal and viably all of Canada t o Britain, the French and Indian War formally finished with the marking of the Treaty of Paris on February 10, 1763.The bargain brought about France's loss of all its North American belonging east of the Mississippi (all of Canada was ceded to Britain) aside from Saint Pierre and Uniquely, two little islands off of Newfoundland, denoting the start of a period of British strength outside Europe. The French and Indian War changed the political, efficient, and ideological relations in the middle of Britain and its American provinces. English obligation lead to uncalled for levy of the homesteaders, and this changed the way they felt about their homeland.After the French and Indian War, the nation's colonizing North America moved. After 1763 (Doc. An), English settlements ruled the new world. This took a toll on the political relationship in the middle of Britain and the American pilgrims in light of the fact that it prompt the Proclamation of 1763. The Native Americans (Doc. B) accepte d â€Å"they had no privilege to settle. † The Proclamation was Britain's concept of counteracting further clash. On the other hand, the settlers were rankled, and they accepted they were being denied of their entitlement to be free.Even though overseas ideological qualities to Britain started to change amid the war, the pilgrims' capacity to experience with the blacklists demonstrated they could unite to roll out improvement. All the tariff and regulation added to the hatred pioneers as of now felt before the Proclamation of 1763. Additionally, the French and Indian War, helped American fighters understand they had less freedom than Englishmen. A Massachusetts warrior composed (Doc. D) â€Å"we are suspended Englishmen freedom. American disdain that emerged amid this period helped trigger pioneer disobedience.The French and Indian War is at fault for the American Revolution. Ideologically, it raised pioneer emotions of hatred to Britain. It additionally changed the politica l relationship in the middle of England and its settlers in light of the fact that the English were compelled to unjustifiably impose them because of their efficient battles. The pioneers thus, boycotted, in this manner further harming their financial association with their homeland. After the French and Indian War, America would never be the same.Maximum number of characters (including HTML tags added by text editor): 60,000 Show/Hide Rich-Text Editor Question 2 of 4 1. 1 . The narrative suggests that the war for American independence was not inevitable, that the British empire could have been saved. Do you agree? At what point during the imperial crisis was peaceful compromise possible? 2. Mans After the war for American Independence, John Adams asserted that the Americans were considering autonomy much sooner than the war that began in 1775. I accept that the British Empire could have effectively been safeguarded.War was not inescapable. Had King George Ill not treated the pilgri ms like getting out of hand youngsters from whom he could benefit, peace could have been kept up, and the American Revolution could have been forestalled. At first, the pioneers would not have liked to be divided from England. They just needed the same English rights that the Englanders were managed by the crown. On the other hand, contrasts over the obligation of who would pay for the expense of the Seven Years War and Britain's mercantilism arrangements incited over levy with no representation.At the point when the establishing fathers accumulated at the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia in 1 775, they had two essential objectives. As a matter of first importance, they needed to declare their entitlement to English rights, including representation. Furthermore, they needed to vow their steadfastness to England. To do this, they sent the Olive Branch Petition in a last endeavor to approach the lord for some help from duties and abuse. The dialect in the appeal is unassumi ng as the originators concede to the ruler and vow their faithfulness.Moreover, in the event that they were to stay with Great Britain, they would get the security of the British war fleet and the most effective domain on the planet. Lamentably, when the lord got the request, he declined to peruse it. Rather, he blamed the pioneers for hard and fast injustice, expressing that they had â€Å"continued to open and acknowledged disobedience. † The settlers by then understood that they would not be given the same rights and fundamentally they would dependably be considered only a wellspring of subsidizing for the ruler.It was as though the 13 provinces were the ruler's contracted servants-?just he was not keen on continually providing for them their flexibility. So yes, the Empire could have en spared if the King had listened to the pilgrims and accepted that they were acting in accordance with some basic honesty by sending the Olive Branch Petition. Obviously, the following arch ive that the lord would get would be the Declaration of Independence, which was, in reality, capital punishments for the individuals who marked it. Though war could have been counteracted with the Olive Branch Petition, with the Declaration, it was positively Inescapable. . Who was to blame for Britain's failure to win a quick victory over the American rebels: General Howe, General Burgeoned, or the ministers in London? Explain your answer. Mans Sir William Howe was an English General who was commandant and head of British strengths amid the American Revolutionary War. On January 4, 1756, Howe was delegated major of the recently structured 60th Regiment (redesigned 58th in 1 757) and headed out with the unit to North America for operations against the French. In this limit he joined in Major General Jeffery Amherst effective attack of Luxurious that late spring.With the demise of his sibling, Brigadier General George Howe at the Battle of Carillon that July, William accomplished a s eat in parliament speaking to Nottingham. Staying in North America, Howe served in Wolf's assault on Quebec in 1759. General Howe was reprimanded for Britain's inability to win a snappy triumph over the American Rebels. America's triumph to autonomy changed to course of history. Through a triumph the fight affected Howe and pulverize his conviction that the dissidents speak to a little piece of the American individuals.Burgeoned proposed an arrangement for vanquishing the Americans he needed to lead an armed force south while the second segment propels east. This arrangement was to be progressed by Howe. Rather the arrangement was sanction by Colonial Secretary Lord George Germane. Hose's part was never unmistakably characterized, and was never issued requests from London to assistant Burgeoned. Burgeoned was left all alone, and was vanquished in the discriminating clash of Saratoga. Howe dispatched his own battle to catch the American legislative center at Philadelphia.As I would l ike to think I don't think it was Hose's deficiency on the grounds that it was Burnoose's arrangement, and he was the one driving the British to this fight. In spite of the fact that, the arrangement was never exceptional by Howe rather it was endorsed by Lord Germane so I think Lord Germane ought to hold a percentage of the obligation regarding the annihilation. Under serious feedback in England for losing to the Americans the lord no more had trust in Howe. Howe asked for to be calmed. Howe got word his acquiescence had been endorsed. 3. Why did Britain switch to a Southern military strategy?Why did that strategy ultimately fail? Mans The British surrender at Yorktown on October nineteenth, 1781 denoted the end of the British procedure to assuage the southern provinces, which got to be known as the Southern Campaign, and denoted the start of the end of British manage in the settlements. Led amid the Revolutionary War from 1780-1781 , it was a consequence of a sensational move in p rocedure that happened after the British misfortune at Saratoga. The battle was focused around a mistaken presumption that the Southern settlements contained an extensive populace of followers, and in this way could be immediately assuaged.The supporters could then be prepared, and in this manner utilized to control the South, liberating British strengths to lead operations somewhere else. The supposition of Loyalist backing in the south did not precisely reflect the mentality in the locale, where British authenticity was at hat point on disappear. As an aftereffect of the shaky authenticity of British reason, they expected to execute a course reading assignment program. The ineffectively planned and executed arrangement, nonetheless, really aroused the crowded and pushed them around the renegade reason, further undermining the authenticity of the operation.The British changed to a southern military technique after General Henry' Clinton touched base in the States to assume control charge Of British troops from William Howe. Clinton chose that the British endeavors in the North had fizzled and that they ought o move South. The South, he felt, would be a superior spot for the British on the grounds that it was accepted that the South had numerous a greater number of Loyalists than the North did. The British felt that they would be in friendlier region there. They would have the capacity to attract on Tory quality to supplement the regulars.They would assemble energy by winning in the South and would then move back North to complete the occupation. There are mainly two reasons behind the failure of the strategy which are: First and foremost, General Henry Clinton took care of the Southern system seriously. He alienated numerous in the South who may have been dependable to the Crown. He did this, for instance, by making a guarantee to freedom to all slaves who would come to British-controlled region. This frightened slave owners and made a greater amount Of them backing the resistance. Second, the methodology utilized by American General Nathaniel Greene was exceptionally viable.He rehearsed a technique of making the British pursue him all over while rejecting any huge pitched fights. This constrained the British to attempt to â€Å"live off the area,† which implied that they needed to aka supplies from neighborhood individuals. This served to make the Southern people contradict the British. Hence, less Southerners stayed devoted to the Crown and the Southern system fizzled. 4. Why was the Constitution a controversial document even as it was being written? Mans The United States Constitution was composed more than 200 years back and it has been utilized as the establishment for the legislature.The constitution has been and still remains the strongest political understanding ever. Despite the fact that a moving record, its creation was not that simple yet dubious. Its signers were partitioned over various significant issues which prom pted protracted contentions when it was being composed. After its creation the Constitution still stays dubious. It has ended up being the epicenter of Civil Rights activism, clash between state sway and national amusingness, sketchy over widespread human services and marriage controversy . The bargains on the key issues that described its genesis are in charge of the discussion of the basic archive.From the earliest starting point of its creation the constitution thoughts were isolated between the backers. The supporters comprehended hat that the constitution was a thought of the republican considering, giving for another level to the individuals' chosen government. Then again, the faultfinders were persuaded that the republicans adjusted themselves in little political units, the states. The partition of forces between the focal government and the state governments was accordingly a significant discussion as the constitution archive was being composed and emerges as a vital issue e xceptional.The agents drafting the constitution experienced issues over the state representation. The delegates that were speaking to rater states bolstered for a populace based representation while the agents from littler states thought an equivalent number Of delegates for each State was reasonable prompting the Electoral College. From its establishment, the U. S. Constitution was a controversial document, praised as a solution to the nation's woes and condemned as a perversion of its republican principles. Critics charged that republican institutions worked only in small political units – the states.Advocates answered that the Constitution extended republicanism by adding another level of government elected by the people. In this composite political system, the new national government would exercise limited, delegated powers, and the existing state governments would retain authority over all other problems. Question 3 off 25. 0 points 1. 1 . Weigh the relative importance o f the Industrial and Market revolutions in changing the American economy. In what ways was the economy different in 1860 from what it had been in 1800? How would you explain those differences? 2.Mans 3. The American economy was dominating agricultural in 1800. This changed drastically by 1860 with the Industrial and Market insurgencies. New canonical machines permitted the industrialist to deliver more products, quicker, and hence more labor was required. A business economy was conceived. New employments were made in the Northern states, while the Southern ones experienced the extension of bondage. The impact of the Industrial and Market unrest in the South was reflected in the large scale manufacturing of cotton, needed for the material business in the North.The solid industrialization had as result the individuals' relocation from country regions to the urban areas, furthermore a huge increment in populace, as living guidelines moved forward. However the Industrial Revolution had additionally a negative effect on the common laborers, who were existing in packed and unsanitary houses and had troublesome working conditions. Generally speaking, the Industrial and Market Revolution was an essential defining moment in the American history and had as outcome the change from an agrarian and rustic culture into a modern and urban one. . In what ways did the emerging industrial economy conflict with artisan republicanism? How did wage laborers respond to the new economy? Mans In 1 sass to sass, industrialization began in United States when producers ND shippers expanded their item yield through building production lines and re-sorting out work. Through these development methodologies, the cost of merchandise was brought down, and division of work got to be more proficient. Then again, the laborers control over conditions and pace of work was dissolved.For the errands that were unsuited to outwork, there was the production of mind Austria facilities portrayed by speci alization of obligations and assignments. The producers depended on steam motors to drive the factories and machines that utilized power as a part of generation. Britons expected that the American producers could get to be included in fares. Accordingly, Britain anticipated fare of material apparatus any fares and also migration of the mechanics. Be that as it may, the presentation of the cotton spinner in America by Samuel Slater denoted the start of Industrial Revolution.England planned defensive enactment that came about to lessened creation rates than in America. Thus, Americans began to enhance their machines and left on mechanical advancement. The ascent of compensation work at the heart of the Industrial Revolution additionally abused working individuals in new ways. The principal strike among material laborers challenging pay and production line conditions happened in 1 824 and even the model factories of Lowell confronted extensive strikes in the sass.Mechanical upheaval ch anged lives of the specialists and the way of their work. Most experts in America created a belief system of artisan republican that relied on upon standards of equity and freedom. They viewed themselves as equivalent and free from constrained work. The expanded republicanism saw numerous specialists taking more wage acquiring occupations. A few workers framed unions and their haggling force with the genuineness elevated. The greater part of the artisans confronting dangers from industrialization began specific shops.The American and English law legalized laborers from sorting out themselves with the point of getting their wages raised. By and by, the development of the work hypothesis of quality by union pioneers as a shared profits society looked for better work conditions and better wage. 3. Why did Protestant Christianity and Protestant women emerge as forces for social change? Mans In the United States, the force of the Protestant and Catholic beliefs was titled amid the pilgri m period, and, in spite of the fact that ladies dwarfed men in the chapels, the congregation chain of importance was solely male.Not until the nineteenth century in the US do history specialists normally see the beginnings of noteworthy social change in ladies' religious parts. Virginia was the biggest, most crowded and most imperative province. The Church of England was legitimately settled; the minister of London made it a most loved preacher target and sent in 22 ministers by 1624. By and by, foundation implied that nearby expenses were piped through the neighborhood area to Andre the needs of nearby government, for example, streets and poor help, notwithstanding the compensation of the clergyman.There never was a minister in provincial Virginia, and by and by the neighborhood vestry comprised of laymen who controlled the ward and took care of nearby expenses, streets and poor easing. The settlers were ordinarily preoccupied, uninterested, and exhausted amid chapel administration s as indicated by the pastors, who grumbled that the individuals were dozing, whispering, gazing at the elegantly dressed ladies, strolling about and advancing and going, or, best ease scenario watching out the windows or gazing blankly into space.Against a predominating view that eighteenth century Americans had not sustained the first pioneers' enthusiastic responsibility to their confidence, researchers now recognize an abnormal state of religious vitality in provinces after 1700. As indicated by one master, religion was in the â€Å"climb as opposed to the declension†; an alternate sees a â€Å"climbing imperativeness in religious life† from 1700 ahead; a third discovers religion in numerous parts of the settlements in a condition Of â€Å"hot development. † Figures on chapel articulation and church development help these sentiments.Somewhere around 1700 and 1 740, an expected 75-80% of the populace went to places of worship, which were being assembled at a headlong pace. By 1 780 the rate of grown-up pilgrims who stuck to a congregation was between 10-30%, not including slaves or Native Americans. North Carolina had the most minimal rate at around 4%, while New Hampshire and South Carolina were tied for the most elevated, at around 16%. Church structures in eighteenth century America fluctuated significantly, from the plain, unobtrusive structures in gently settled rustic regions to rich buildings in the prosperous urban areas on the eastern seaboard.Chapels reflected the traditions and conventions and in addition the riches and societal position of the groups that manufactured them. German holy places contained peculiarities obscure in English ones. 4. Why did women's issues suddenly become so prominent in American culture? Mans In the early sass position of American ladies was legitimately and socially second rate compared to men. Ladies could ‘t vote and, if wedded, couldn't possess property or hold their own income. The chan ge developments of the sass, particularly annulment and moderation, gave ladies an opportunity to get included in general society stadium.Ladies reformers soon started to disturb not only for restraint and abrogation, additionally for ladies' rights. Activists, for example, Angelina and Sarah Grimm, Elizabeth Caddy Stanton, and Lucrative Motto contended that men and ladies are made equivalent and ought to be dealt with thusly under the law. These backers associated with abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison, likewise a fervent women's activist, fusing the forces of the cancellation and the ladies' rights developments. Different backers of both reasons incorporate Sojourner Truth and Frederick Douglass.

Eassay of To kill and elaphant Essay Example

Eassay of To kill and elaphant Essay Example Eassay of To kill and elaphant Essay Eassay of To kill and elaphant Essay Lowell begins the story with the discontent the police officer has with his job and India with its oppressors, keeping the conflict in the mind of the readers early on and constant. The narrator draws back on his memories which haunt him of when he had to make a choice and chose his pride. Lowell often writes about imperialism, in no shape or form hiding his distaste for it and often poking fun at it, such in 1984 and Animal Farm. He was born in India and moved to England for schooling and then ongoing the Imperial army after becoming unhappy with British treatment of the native Burmese, he left the police service. This often Influences his writings, drawing back on his personal first hand perspective of the land and the people. He struggles with in my opinion three things, one with the British Empire because of its unjust occupation of Burma, two with the Burmese because of their mockery of him, and three with himself In his struggle with his conscience and self-image. He detests his job and he believes that imperialism is terrible. Orwell sees the British rule as an unbreakable tyranny, as something clamped down Upon the will of prostate peoples. My question to this is though, is he talking solely of the British or is he talking also of the Burmese people. He talks of utter silence that Is Imposed on every Englishman in the East. to me it seems as though hes speaking as though Great Britain seems to think of its self as better than the rest and its imposing that rule into its people, that they must snub the countrymen and ignore all signs that point that maybe what theyre doing is wrong. This creates a wall between him and the people he so kindly believes In. Enable to share this with his own people and unable to have a relationship with the people of the country, he lives In a sort of mental isolation. Forced to keep his opinions and feelings to himself, he becomes lonely and a depression creeps over him and hes just waiting for the chance to get out of this Job, like many of us now. Also the selfish desire to be liked no matter the consequence is showed when he shoots the elephant; he knew how Important it was and how much the people added It even If they TLD. He shoots It anyways. HIS honesty towards his situation gained my trust and had me decide that he was a reliable narrator. He was brutal on both sides of the spectrum, talking of the nonsense that both countries have, and he spared no details on death the elephant caused lying on his belly with arms crucified and head sharply twisted to the side. and untimely the elephants very slowly and in great agony death. The only question I have with him is wither he really blames the British and Burmese for his struggle rather than confront himself ND see if maybe this could be inside his head, he seems to place all his judgment on them and see them as the reason of his anger not Just a side effect of It. It makes me wonder If things where as bad as he made them or not. His description of the elephant changes from the first time he mentions it to point 1 OFF choice that effects the rest of his life. The elephant becomes all the things he sees wrong with Great Britain and also all the things he loves about it. He reflects his inner conflict onto the situation. He does not want to shoot it. He never planned on it; the UN was a form of self-defense in the beginning. With the crowd gathering around him the people created a tension especially for one of the Queens lawmen he knows that the people are watching his every move and how itll reflect on his country, he needs to keep in pride in his opinion. They want him to kill it; its killed them and their homes. In his mind he also sees that but he also acknowledges that the elephant is the biggest source of work, it does the heavy farm work and without it there would be more work for the people. Exactly like Great Britain. Like the elephant, the empire is rueful. When the elephant raids the bazaar, he symbolizes the British Empire raiding the economy of Burma Thats not the only symbol he uses, he also uses the Burmese as a symbol of people losing themselves for power, l perceived in this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys. He becomes a sort of hollow, posing dummy, the conventionalism figure of a sahibs. For it is the condition of his rule that he shall spend his life in trying to impress the natives and so in every crisis he has got to do what the natives expect of him. He wears a mask, and his face grows to fit it. In the end he wants these peoples respect, honestly he Just wants anybody respect, and he wants to look needed and tough. He makes the mistake of not thinking it through or seeking advice from his fellow policemen or even a merchant or anyone that was following him. He puts this misbehaved amount of pressure on himself to shoot it, he honestly could have Just let it go, but the people wouldnt really like that so he automatically assumed thatd mean they would like him less. He shoots the elephant. Its a struggle; it takes more than one shot, each with its own memory imprinted on him and his choice. Each of us makes choices, we choose to follow the crowd or make a path for ourselves. No matter the consequence we do what we believe we need to do for ourselves or those we care for, Lowell tells this in his story he shows the truth in selfish desire. The choices we make may seem trivial at the time but each affects our lives, maybe it even sets the course of our lives.

The Origin of the Name Nunavut

The Origin of the Name Nunavut The meaning of Nunavut is the Inuktitut word for our land.  Nunavut is one of the three territories and 10 provinces that make up Canada. Nunavut became a territory of Canada in 1999, formed from the eastern region of the mainland Northwest Territories and most of the Arctic Archipelago.  The vast territory is helmed by its capital,  Iqaluit, located at the head of  Frobisher Bay  on southern  Baffin Island. In 1975, an accord, the  James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement, was agreed upon  between the Canadian federal government, the Province of Quebec and Inuit representatives. This accord resulted in the establishment of the  Kativik Regional Government  in the Nunavik territory, and the residents of all 14 Nunavik settlements now elect their own representatives in regional elections. The Inuktitut Language Inuktitut, or Eastern Canadian  Inuktitut, is one of the principal  Inuit languages  of  Canada. It is also an aboriginal language that is  written  using the Canadian Aboriginal syllabics. Syllabics is a family of  consonant-based alphabets called abugidas. It is used by several Aboriginal  Canadian  language families including Algonquian,  Inuit, and Athabaskan.   Vastly different from the  Latin script used by more widespread  languages, the use of  syllabics greatly increases the likelihood of literacy among readers, due to its ease of use.   The Inuktitut language is spoken throughout Arctic Canada, including all areas north of the  tree line. The northern regions in the provinces of Quebec, Newfoundland Labrador,  Manitoba,  and  Nunavut use the language, as well as the Northwest Territories.  Inuktitut not only refers to the language but the entire culture of the Eastern Canadian Inuit.   Inuit Culture and Language The Inuit mannerisms, social behaviors, and values make up Inuktitut, in addition to the written and spoken word. An Inuktitut education takes place outside of traditional schools in the home,  and also on the land, sea, and ice. Young tribe members observe their parents and elders  and practice their new language and life skills in order to perfect them. The word  Inuit means the people, and it is an autonym. The singular form is  Inuk. Lifestyle Based Around Extreme Weather Conditions The Inuit lifestyle is completely based around the  extreme weather conditions they must endure. Basic survival skills along with fishing, hunting and  trapping are essential for daily life. Agriculture has always been an impossibility, so instead, the  Inuit diet is unlike any typical eating plan found elsewhere in the world. Beluga whale, seal, arctic char, crab, walrus, caribou, duck, moose, caribou, quail and geese make up almost the entirety of their diet, except in the warmer months when field roots and  berries, such as cloudberries are picked and served, when in season. This meat and fat-heavy diet has proven to be a health issue for the Inuits. Many suffer from  a  low  calcium and vitamin D intake, but surprisingly, a vitamin C definitely has not been an issue for most.

Launching Energy-R Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words - 2

Launching Energy-R - Case Study Example It is regarded by many critics that marketing is the most crucial of all the functional aspects of the business; it can be argued that marketing is the prime means for attracting a customer, and without customers, there is little that the other departments are going to do. Marketing is important in helping the company to construct upon their corporate and business foundations, and to use them to solidify their goals. In order to further the objectives of the business, the business needs to consider the bigger picture. From the perspective of launching a product in the market, the bigger picture would entail exploring the market potential for the product, researching the competitors in the market giving particular attention to their strengths and weaknesses, coming up with an appropriate marketing strategy for the product and selecting suitable marketing channels. Moreover, it is also important to develop apposite measures for managing and supervising the launch of the product in the market. The purpose of this paper is to research the market potential for an energy drink in London, UK, and to go through the aforementioned process of launching a product. The energy drink is called Energy-R. The initial part of the paper reviews the literature explaining strategic and operational literature. There are various marketing orientations that the customers show towards the consumption of products. Functioning businesses have two main purposes. Firstly, they are working for the retention of the customers that they have attracted. Secondly, businesses are endeavoring to attract new customers and increase their clientele. There are a number of philosophies that can be implemented for the attainment of these two goals of the business. The first philosophy relates to the production concept. This means that all consumers are going to consume those products that are not only within the range of affordability but are also easily and extensively found.

Factors that contributed to the creation of the power-sharing regime Essay

Factors that contributed to the creation of the power-sharing regime of the KMT and the CCP in twentieth century China - Essay Example The development of political systems worldwide is related to a series of factors. Normally, the economic and social conditions of a country are set the criteria on which the country’s political framework has to be based At this point, it has been proved that the level of influence of the above conditions on local politics can be differentiated; China is such case. Due to its strong culture and traditions – which have managed to keep their power despite the pressures from Western ethics – the country managed to remain autonomous in the international community; this target was mostly achieved through the establishment of a political system which emphasizes on the independency of the country, not just in terms of culture but also of the production (industrial and agriculture). It seems that the power-sharing regime of KMT and the CCP parties has contributed to the above result. The factors that led to the development of the above regime are examined in this paper. E mphasis is given on the political conflicts and agreements that characterize the specific regime and the initiatives developed each time for the political stabilization of the country. 2. Factors that contributed to the creation of the power-sharing regime of the KMT and the CCP in twentieth century China. The fall of communism in Eastern Europe had left the impression that all countries with similar political systems were likely to follow the same route; however, there was an exception; reference is made to China, a country the political framework of which is based on the principles of communism ... In the context of the imperial power, the emperor had the power to govern with no limitations or restrictions, keeping his power to delegate certain tasks to ‘other individuals and organizations’ (Zheng, 2010, p.62). Also, it was under the influence of the imperial power that China’s political system had accepted the views of Rousseau on political governance – and not that of Locke (Zheng 2010, p.62). In other words, the power-sharing regime, which currently characterizes the political system of China, can be considered as differentiated from the country’s traditional political thought. However, this difference is not as high as expected, a view, which can be developed after examining the political practices of CCP and KMT parties – which participate in the political group that currently governs China. More specifically, a closer review of the political decisions and initiatives of China’s Party can lead to the assumption that the power -sharing regime has two different dimensions: at a first level, the CCP is able ‘to decentralize its powers to other actors according to its needs’ (Zheng 2010, p.62); however, CCP can also ‘recentralize its powers with no notice, if this is necessary’ (Zheng, 2010, p.62), a fact that proves the limited borders of the power-sharing regime in China. The reasons that led CCP to accept a power-regime framework with non-communist parties are analytically explained in the study of Zheng (1997); in accordance with the above study, the first of these reasons was relate with the political power of KMT. The followers of the party were many. The leaders of CCP understood that even many of the supporters of Chiang Kai-Shek decided to follow him in Taiwan, still many